<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated &quot;New Project Map&quot; (NM) tag posted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/</link>
	<description>Getting Things Done with MindManager</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ActivityOwner</title>
		<link>http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-13867</link>
		<dc:creator>ActivityOwner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activityowner.com/?p=388#comment-13867</guid>
		<description>The modification adding the boundary to the intray for the nm tag is now in the beta setup.exe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The modification adding the boundary to the intray for the nm tag is now in the beta setup.exe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ActivityOwner</title>
		<link>http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-13866</link>
		<dc:creator>ActivityOwner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 04:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activityowner.com/?p=388#comment-13866</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike -- Nice to see you using the nm tag.  I find it lowers the barrier to defining a clean project just enough that I do it quite a bit more often.   The nm tag does most of its work with a macro:

http://wiki.activityowner.com/index.php?title=Ao_new_project_map.mmbas

I just made some changes to add the yellow boundary to the in-tray.  You have to take the text from the wiki and put it into the macro in the AO directory as I haven&#039;t rolled this into the installation yet. 

 I&#039;m a strong believer in using a sub-project icon in the in-tray so that projects that run out of next actions are flagged (resultsmanager sees the default in-tray as an action).   

You could change the text for the &quot;Plan&quot; about three quarters of the way down in the macro.   What would you prefer it to be?   Perhaps it could be a new default or made more configurable.  This particular macro code very cleanly written and could be made more customizable.  

I&#039;m not sure how to go about adding the in-tray image to a topic using a macro. 

I&#039;m mainly a user of the tools here these days, but I always enjoy the comments and suggestions that come in as it makes the tools more useful to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike &#8212; Nice to see you using the nm tag.  I find it lowers the barrier to defining a clean project just enough that I do it quite a bit more often.   The nm tag does most of its work with a macro:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.activityowner.com/index.php?title=Ao_new_project_map.mmbas" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.activityowner.com/index.php?title=Ao_new_project_map.mmbas</a></p>
<p>I just made some changes to add the yellow boundary to the in-tray.  You have to take the text from the wiki and put it into the macro in the AO directory as I haven&#039;t rolled this into the installation yet. </p>
<p> I&#039;m a strong believer in using a sub-project icon in the in-tray so that projects that run out of next actions are flagged (resultsmanager sees the default in-tray as an action).   </p>
<p>You could change the text for the &#034;Plan&#034; about three quarters of the way down in the macro.   What would you prefer it to be?   Perhaps it could be a new default or made more configurable.  This particular macro code very cleanly written and could be made more customizable.  </p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure how to go about adding the in-tray image to a topic using a macro. </p>
<p>I&#039;m mainly a user of the tools here these days, but I always enjoy the comments and suggestions that come in as it makes the tools more useful to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C</title>
		<link>http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-13865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activityowner.com/?p=388#comment-13865</guid>
		<description>Hello,

Okay, so I am FINALLY getting to asking the question in the correct venue.  I had originally posed this question at the Gyronix forum.

Custom Map generation when using the NM tag.

When I generate a map with the NM tag, I cannot continue with the standard work flow when it asks for keyword etc.  The reason is that I like to use a different &quot;in&quot; box.  Actually it is the inbox under Map Parts &gt; Gyronix and the in tray with the yellow back ground.

So, when I do the NM tag, I decline all of the dialog boxes (except for save) and then delete the automatically generated inbox, pull in the one I want and then use the &quot;k&quot; tag and do the key word assignment.

If I can figure out how to modify the NM tag map generation process, I would probably also change few other things such as the &quot;plan&quot; box and such.

Thanks for your great site and your endless work.  It really is appreciated.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Okay, so I am FINALLY getting to asking the question in the correct venue.  I had originally posed this question at the Gyronix forum.</p>
<p>Custom Map generation when using the NM tag.</p>
<p>When I generate a map with the NM tag, I cannot continue with the standard work flow when it asks for keyword etc.  The reason is that I like to use a different &#034;in&#034; box.  Actually it is the inbox under Map Parts &gt; Gyronix and the in tray with the yellow back ground.</p>
<p>So, when I do the NM tag, I decline all of the dialog boxes (except for save) and then delete the automatically generated inbox, pull in the one I want and then use the &#034;k&#034; tag and do the key word assignment.</p>
<p>If I can figure out how to modify the NM tag map generation process, I would probably also change few other things such as the &#034;plan&#034; box and such.</p>
<p>Thanks for your great site and your endless work.  It really is appreciated.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ActivityOwner</title>
		<link>http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-13507</link>
		<dc:creator>ActivityOwner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activityowner.com/?p=388#comment-13507</guid>
		<description>Hello Erik -- Glad to hear program is working for you.  I uploaded a new version that has an option in mindreaderconfig to not auto save.   I&#039;m not sure it will save much time but give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Erik &#8212; Glad to hear program is working for you.  I uploaded a new version that has an option in mindreaderconfig to not auto save.   I&#039;m not sure it will save much time but give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Spitzner</title>
		<link>http://www.activityowner.com/2010/01/17/updated-new-project-map-nm-tag-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-13506</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Spitzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activityowner.com/?p=388#comment-13506</guid>
		<description>Hello,
     I had no idea where else to post a question.  I love using mindreader with outlinkner, I have never felt more organized.  My question is, can I speed up the processing of my gyronix queue?  It just seems when I process all my emails it takes a long time to run the gyronix queue.  From looking how things work, is there a way to stop mindreader from saving a map every time it changes something?  I know this will open me up to issues if anything crashes, but I would like to have the speed up.  Any suggestions would be great.  Thank you for your time and hard work on this project.

erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
     I had no idea where else to post a question.  I love using mindreader with outlinkner, I have never felt more organized.  My question is, can I speed up the processing of my gyronix queue?  It just seems when I process all my emails it takes a long time to run the gyronix queue.  From looking how things work, is there a way to stop mindreader from saving a map every time it changes something?  I know this will open me up to issues if anything crashes, but I would like to have the speed up.  Any suggestions would be great.  Thank you for your time and hard work on this project.</p>
<p>erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

